Elizabeth Warren and her hostile vision towards cryptocurrencies

Elizabeth Warren, Democratic senator from Massachusetts, is at the center of attention for her position considered hostile) on the regulation of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

It is widely known for its rigorous approach to financial regulation, and particularly for its hostility towards cryptocurrencies.

Warren's Concerns About Cryptocurrency

Warren has expressed concerns about the potential for cryptocurrencies to facilitate illegal activities, such as money laundering, terrorist financing, fraud and various forms of financial crime. She also highlighted the lack of transparency and regulation in the cryptocurrency sector.

• Lire: The 7 most famous crypto criminals

“The Treasury Department is clear that we need new laws to crack down on the use of crypto to enable terrorist groups, rogue nations, drug lords, ransomware gangs, and fraudsters to launder billions in stolen funds, evade sanctions, fund illegal weapons programs, and profit from devastating cyberattacks,” Warren said.

Warren's cryptocurrency bill

In response to these concerns, Warren proposed the " Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act » (DAAMA), a law that seeks to strengthen existing regulations and introduce new measures to combat illegal activities related to cryptocurrencies. The bill proposes to extend the obligations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), including know-your-customer (KYC) requirements, to cryptocurrency wallet providers, miners, validators, and other network participants that may validate, secure, or facilitate cryptocurrency transactions.

“Cryptocurrencies operate with little to no oversight. This leaves consumers vulnerable and creates new avenues for malicious actors to finance terrorism and drug trafficking,” said the Senator Luján.

Opposition to Warren's proposal

Despite support from some members of the Senate Banking Committee, Warren's proposal faced significant opposition, both from the cryptocurrency industry and other lawmakers and politicians. Some critics argue that Warren's bill is too broad and could penalize legitimate cryptocurrency activities.

The (uncertain) future of cryptocurrency regulation around the world

Despite the opposition, Warren's proposal represents a growing trend toward stricter regulation of cryptocurrency in the United States.

As the adoption of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies continues to grow, it is likely that we will see more and more discussion around appropriate regulation for this industry.

However, it seems that many countries are opting for a policy of " crypto-friendly " even though they had a hostile policy towards cryptocurrencies as is the case with Nigeria for example. Indeed, the country has just relaxed its crypto laws and has even launched a new stablecoin to revive the digital economy.

Last word

Warren's position on Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general is clear: she sees an urgent need for regulation to protect consumers and prevent illegal activity. This is a position also shared by the head of the SEC, Gary Gensler who declared that cryptocurrencies were a wild west.

However, how these regulations should be implemented is a matter of debate. While some see Warren's proposal as a necessary step toward greater accountability and transparency, others see it as hindering innovation in the cryptocurrency sector. Regardless, it is clear that cryptocurrency regulation will be a significant topic of discussion in the years to come.